News brief
The the Indian Child Welfare Act Thursday, to the surprise of many. Tribal leaders and advocates are calling the decision a win for tribal sovereignty.
The federal law prioritizes placing Indigenous children within their tribe when adopted or in the foster care system. It was challenged in court as a discriminatory race-based law.
Angel Charley is a citizen of Pueblo of Laguna with ties to the Pueblo of Zuni and Navajo Nation, and she heads of the . She said bigger issues were at stake, too.
鈥淭his was never just about Indian children,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t was about the interests of oil and gas.鈥�
Before the 1980s, state child welfare programs and adoption agencies removed up to a third of Native children from their families, and most of them were also removed from their tribes, according to the .
ICWA was created to stop the erosion of Native culture, and if it had been overturned, Charley thinks the impacts would have snowballed.
鈥淚f you disrupt connection to community, you disrupt connection to land, you undermine tribal sovereignty鈥hereby having access to expanding enterprise under extractive industries,鈥� she said.
Today she鈥檚 relieved and full of joy as she reflected on those who advocated for Indigenous families before her 鈥� 鈥淲hat would your ancestors say to you? This is the moment for all of us to celebrate.鈥�
While the federal law was being challenged, some western states, including , and , enacted their own versions to keep Indigenous families together.
